More on the stupidity of outcome based targets here. This paragraph is particularly telling: The first perverse consequence was that although the public expected the police to keep the peace, an officer who successfully stopped trouble was not rewarded because no trouble meant no arrests. More seriously, the police played the Home Office game by going for trivial offenders rather than serious criminals. Solving the case of a child who steals a Mars bar earned as many points as solving a murder. It made more sense to arrest rowdy children for ‘harassing a tree’ than to begin the hard work of tackling a potentially homicidal teenage gang. You get what you measure.

< Prev

Reason or rationality?

An interesting debate on the WIkipedia over the weekend on the definition of philosophy introduced ...

Category:

Further Posts

Next >

Understand HOW does not mean we comprehend WHAT or WHY

I've always found it difficult to understand eliminative materialists. For those who don't know their ...

Category:

Further Posts