My first two Future Backwards facilitations were done small scale, for friends and for free. They gave me the confidence (and the ability to talk convincingly about it) to go out and try it with real live paying clients - next up was a central Government department.
Whenever I pick up a new tool that I think will work with clients, the first step is to try it out low-key, low-cost and low-commitment. That way I take the small stumbling first steps out of sight of clients that might object to mistakes on their dollar. And when I do finally run them externally, I can bring all that I've learned to the project.
It's not unusual for recently graduated Cognitive Edge course participants look around for opportunities to shadow people on pre-existing projects. That's one way of doing it, but I don't think it's terribly effective for anyone involved:
- Clients wonder who the extra person is in the room - are they paying for them or are they (the client) providing free training to this individual
- Consultants have another (unknown) quantity to manage in the room. The extra person may be useful in some exercises, but will need monitoring and support. If it's an easy client relationship and an easy process that's fine, if there are tensions or novelties there, it just ratchets up the stress levels.
- Apprentices (I use the word deliberately) watch and absorb, but it's often difficult to ask questions in the situation. Unless there are problems with the exercise, there is less learning available, other than trying to copy someone else.
Instead, far better - and easier for current practitioners - is to find a small project to cut one's teeth on and ask for advice/help on the project. Lessons are easier learned through one's own mistakes than watching someone else's successes.
Apprentices traditionally were given basic projects to go and complete on their own, get feedback and only then observe masters and practitioners at work, when greater understanding put what they saw in a meaningful context.
And, speaking for myself, I'll happily help and advise people in running their initial projects, but won't bring them on-board to come into a client. Not until I know more about them and have a positive relationship with them.
So, having taken the long way round, I'd suggest to anyone who's recently learned Cognitive Edge techniques and want to put them into practice, first try your local community - who do you know that is already thinking about some future planning (or should be) - offer to run a Future Backwards for them. (Mine were an internet start-up through a friend and a local school putting together a vision.) Look for the opportunities, then go to a current practitioner for advice/conversation about it.
Comments (2)
I traveled the same path back in 2005 Tony! Future-Backwards, Cynefin construction, and Anecdote Circles were all learned with not-for-profits where I volunteered my facilitation services with the caveat that I was an apprentice with little experience but with good training. Worked brilliantly for learning the methods and gaining the confidence to sell engagements thereafter.
Nice to hear that two similar paths were walked oceans apart!
Posted by Michael Cheveldave | February 11, 2010 11:57 PM
Posted on February 11, 2010 23:57
Tony,
Love the boldness to continue experimenting. We'd love to have you as part of the http://KMers.org experiment.
Twitter chats are quite an experiment. You can find 100+ of them here: http://bit.ly/oXBBu I think they are a great way to continuously energize a community.
If you have any interest, would love to have you moderate a session on storytelling or some other topic of interest to you and the community. This weeks was led by Mary Abraham on Personal Knowledge Management: http://www.kmers.org/chatevent/personal-knowledge-management
Posted by Swan | February 12, 2010 2:30 AM
Posted on February 12, 2010 02:30