« bewitched by the binders | Main | low tech and on the ground - Cog Edge methods at work »

old knowledge ignored

Back to my hometown of Rossland for a moment.
Of the 1500 or so houses that make up this mountain town, most of the older homes have simple, steep-pitched metal roofs, perfectly suited to shed the 600 or so centimeters of snow we have fall on us during an average winter. The red or green or blue or yellow roofs gives the town a bit of a gingerbread look if you squint your eyes a bit and use your imagination.
But if you stroll around town, you’ll also see that most of the newer houses are constructed with asphalt shingles and complicated roof lines that hold the snow. I've seen enough examples of this causing problems that I now watch new houses go up and track them over the different winters. I you ask me, most of them don't work like a roof should. I’ll often see roof damage caused by the glacial forces of the deep and heavy snowpack. Or at the very least, there are heating cables stapled onto the lower edges of the shingles, an awkward afterthought.
Last winter I visited a small fishing village named La Ventana in Baja California. The local Mexican fisherman all built their haciendas at least 500 meters back from the shore - close to their boats but well back from the ocean itself. But in the last 20 years, the best and priciest real estate (if you’re a gringo) means perching your trophy home on the edge of the 100 foot sand cliffs. Stunning views for sure, but a walk along the beach provides some graphic examples of concrete retaining walls and stairs hanging broken or suspended while the ground they were built upon has been swept away by the weather. More than a few of the houses themselves have a corner of their foundation completely exposed.
I was going to suggest that these building plans and landscape designs represent a certain brand of hubris, but from a pattern thinking perspective I expect it is something far less sinister. In both Rossland and La Ventana, there are decades of knowledge to be seen, and I suspect, generations of knowledge of where and how to build a house, if only people would ask.

Comments (2)

These are brilliant examples of forgetting stuff that is in plain sight, Terry - do you have any ideas as to how this forgetting took place? A break in the succession of builders - ie new people from "outside" the local building tradition? Inexperienced builders who did not appreciate the purpose of old designs? New owners from outside who thought they knew how to direct the work and design?

Terry Miller:

I would suggest that one influence is the draconian building codes and the building inspectors who enforce them. A typical roof rafter in the old houses was made from 2 X 4 lumber, whereas today's code calls for 2 X 10. I think that while people are annoyed at being forced into overbuilding, these same paranoid constraints paradoxically breeds a certain brand of complacency or sense of invincibility. In other words, if the overcautious code says this roof line meets standard, then it must be okay. And they turn their brains off.
(I admit there are many other factors that make a building work, such as the skills of the builder.)
But the other factor I think is in play is how the romance of aesthetics blinds us to function. For example, a couple I know worked hard for the better part of a year, planning their new house. Many a beer was spent pouring over sketches. One subject was where to locate the master bedroom. They chose large windows, facing south, on the top floor of the house, which aesthetically netted them privacy and a commanding view of the mountains, but for a few weeks each summer, has netted them sweltering, restless nights.
Yes, we talked about this, but again, with the latest in high tech windows and such stringent insulation codes, they believed on paper they could overcome the sun and the laws of physics.

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)