Just got back from the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society conference in New York City. The conference hotel was in Times Square, and it was hopping! New York is an amazing place. I think most of the tourists were from other countries – taking advantage of the de-valued dollar as it tanks even more after the current financial fiasco…
I was very surprised to hear Dave say that any area of the US has better public transit than the UK. Usually we are worse than anyone else in that respect. The SF Bay Area (including San Jose) is an exception, as is New York City, and maybe Boston and Washington DC. I take BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) to campus and love it. What we need in the US is more rail transport – our train system is very old and most passenger trains share tracks with freight trains. Maybe now that gas prices are becoming comparable to European prices we will see more people demanding better rail transportation.
I got several comments on the ‘signifying political rhetoric’ entry and they made me realize that having a good story is essential for candidates. Ronald Reagan was a master of this – although he didn’t always make clear (if he himself knew for sure) whether the story was part of his life or one of his movie roles! A colleague did a study in the 1980’s looking at the cognitive complexity of US Presidents’ speeches, and found that Reagan was the least complex of all that he analyzed. And he was known as the ‘Great Communicator.’ Ironic.
« Making connections in the Cog-Edge network. | Main | Cognitive Complexity »
Comments (2)
Is there a particular type of story that is better for political candidates? I am thinking of the difference between, say, personal identity stories and stories about where the country is at and why. For instance, McCain uses (arguably is dependant on) his POW experience. Whereas Reagan and most Republicans since had a story about how the country got to the nadir they see it in - New Dealers, secular liberals etc. FDR probably had a similar story for the Great Depression. Is one more constructive than the other, in terms of getting the political conditions right for political action?
Also, your colleague's study of Presidential complexity sounds very interesting. What are the details of it? And would I be right in assuming that Lincoln and Jefferson were the most complex? I also wonder how George Dubya Bush ranks with Reagan...
Posted by Justin Kerr | September 30, 2008 11:31 PM
Posted on September 30, 2008 23:31
As a naive observer of executive communications, I've occasionally wondered if there's an inverse relationship between the size of the group being addressed by an executive and the maximumim complexity of an effective message. It seems like the larger the group, the simpler the message has to be if it is going to be effective. If this is the case, it raises interesting questions about how leaders of large organizations catalyze effective sensemaking and action.
Posted by WalterRSmith | October 7, 2008 3:31 PM
Posted on October 7, 2008 15:31