« Five spices | Main | Phronesis »

Drachten, horses & cognition

A well written posting from Mark Gould that picks up the origin of the word manage in english (manège, french for the art of training and riding horses) moving on through a series if interesting quotes to traffic management with a great example to compliment the Magic roundabout in Swindon. This example is all about removing excessive control (centralised cognition) in the forms of traffic lights. Its also described here and you can see it in action here.

There is of course an ideological danger in these examples, starting to believe that management per se is a bad idea. Distributed cognition (I far prefer that to wisdom of crowds which is more often the blindness of herds) takes place within a management framework. It is enabled by management, its not the same thing as delegation or for that matter anarchy. Management set the boundaries, stimulate activity within the system then amplify or dampen emergent patterns. Its not an either/or but a both/and.

The Dutch traffic engineer referenced in the example shows great insight: here. I wuote from the referenced article in Wired. Hans Monderman is a traffic engineer who hates traffic signs. Oh, he can put up with the well-placed speed limit placard or a dangerous curve warning on a major highway, but Monderman considers most signs to be not only annoying but downright dangerous. To him, they are an admission of failure, a sign - literally - that a road designer somewhere hasn't done his job. "The trouble with traffic engineers is that when there's a problem with a road, they always try to add something," Monderman says. "To my mind, it's much better to remove things". What we have to remember is that the engineers are there at the start to set up the conditions from which the system evolves.

Comments (4)

Harold:

Yes, Hans Monderman is world-famous in the Netherlands. As with any profet he has as much people against him (especially traffic experts) as proponents (majorily local supporters).

Surely Distributed Cognition is not quite the same thing as "Wisdom of Crowds"?

The former is about how individuals in a group combine their different skills and knowledge to make a larger whole. The latter is (supposed to be) a statistical phenomenon, that many /independent/ estimates can produce a more accurate result than a smaller set of related opinions.

Dave Snowden [TypeKey Profile Page]:

I prefer to avoid the term Wisdom of Crowds if possible as I think its a misnomer. I would see the statistical phenomena described in th book (other than prediction markets which are not a valid example) as a sub-set of Distributed Cognition.

christianhauck [TypeKey Profile Page]:

adding signs to a poorly designed road is like adding excessive help or training to a poorly designed computer tool.

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)